Both Facebook and the co-founder Mark Zuckerberg are being sued for 1billion dollars for a ‘Third Intifada’ page that wasn’t closed soon enough. Facebook has bought about revolutionary changes in the last year; it was used by the Egyptian civilians to raise a voice against their leader. It has proved to be an excellent platform that helped the people gain freedom from a vicious leader. Perhaps that is what the Palestinians had in mind when they developed the page ‘third intifada’. The word intifada is a protest or movement in itself but it was first developed for a positive change. This positive group slowly began walking through the road to violence and the administrators were later said to be involved too.
Larry Claymen who says he is ‘an American citizen of Jewish origin’ apparently had had enough of the fan page and so decided to sue Facebook because of their delay in removing the page. Claymen describes himself as being ‘someone who is active in matters concerning the security of Israel and all people’. According to Claymen the page should have been removed a long time ago because it was encouraging violence and bloodshed. The renowned American activist and former Justice Department prosecutor also states that Zuckerberg did not remove the page earlier because the popularity as well as the net worth of Facebook was increasing due to this page.
The page had been removed on 29th March right after it had reached fans up to 500,000 and after Zuberberg was sent a special request to take it down by the Israeli Public Diplomacy Minister, Yuri Edelstein A Facebook spokesperson said that ‘the case is without merit, and that we will fight vigorously’. It is evident from this statement that Facebook doesn’t plan on paying the 1billion; instead it will fight and prove that the case itself has no ground what so ever.
Facebook in its defense for the lawsuit states that
“The page, The Third Palestinian Intifada, began as a call for peaceful protest, even though it used a term that has been associated with violence in the past. In addition, the administrators initially removed comments that promoted violence. However, after publicity of the page, more comments deteriorated to direct calls for violence. Eventually, the administrators also participated in these calls. After administrators of the page received repeated warnings about posts that violated our policies, we removed the Page.
We continue to believe that people on Facebook should be able to express their opinions, and we don’t typically take down content that speak out against countries, religions, political entities or ideas.
However we monitor Pages that are reported to us and when they degrade to direct calls for violence or expressions of hate-as occurred in this case- we have and will continue to take them down.”

